<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compliance badges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://accessibility.net.nz/blog/compliance-badges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://accessibility.net.nz/blog/compliance-badges/</link>
	<description>Your web accessibility expert</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 23:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas</title>
		<link>http://accessibility.net.nz/blog/compliance-badges/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 20:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accessibility.net.nz/?p=69#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Arielle, I'd also rather think that website should be accessible by default.  It's not like it is that difficult to make a site work from an accessibility point of view.

Although I *suspect* that no one would volunteer to put in a "hey I suck" badge on their site ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arielle, I&#039;d also rather think that website should be accessible by default.  It&#039;s not like it is that difficult to make a site work from an accessibility point of view.</p>
<p>Although I *suspect* that no one would volunteer to put in a &#034;hey I suck&#034; badge on their site ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arielle</title>
		<link>http://accessibility.net.nz/blog/compliance-badges/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Arielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accessibility.net.nz/?p=69#comment-36</guid>
		<description>I'd rather think that websites should be accessible by default. As Leo puts it, it's the unnecessary gimmicks that pose as challenges. Perhaps, it's better to have a non-accessibility badge than to have an accessibility badge so that people will know that they shouldn't expect too much from a website because of the gimmicks? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;d rather think that websites should be accessible by default. As Leo puts it, it&#039;s the unnecessary gimmicks that pose as challenges. Perhaps, it&#039;s better to have a non-accessibility badge than to have an accessibility badge so that people will know that they shouldn&#039;t expect too much from a website because of the gimmicks? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://accessibility.net.nz/blog/compliance-badges/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accessibility.net.nz/?p=69#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Nicolas, 

I totally agree with you.

Most of the time badges are used to make the site owner feel good about his / her website and not in the interest of the (disabled) visitor.

What people tend to forget is that a web page, if coded properly, is accessible by default. It's bad coding practices or unnecessary gimmicks (flash, javascript...) that make the page less accessible and sometimes non-accessible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicolas, </p>
<p>I totally agree with you.</p>
<p>Most of the time badges are used to make the site owner feel good about his / her website and not in the interest of the (disabled) visitor.</p>
<p>What people tend to forget is that a web page, if coded properly, is accessible by default. It&#039;s bad coding practices or unnecessary gimmicks (flash, javascript&#8230;) that make the page less accessible and sometimes non-accessible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

