<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alt Attributes Can Be Tricky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://accessibility.net.nz/blog/alt-attributes-can-be-tricky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://accessibility.net.nz/blog/alt-attributes-can-be-tricky/</link>
	<description>Your web accessibility expert</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 23:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stevie D</title>
		<link>http://accessibility.net.nz/blog/alt-attributes-can-be-tricky/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevie D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 11:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accessibility.net.nz/?p=61#comment-32</guid>
		<description>I completely agree that a lot of authors give far too many images "alt text".

The test I always use is "What would I want to be there if the image can't be shown?" - it sounds so simple, but it does help me to think about whether an image really needs alt-ing.

That's particularly true when the image simply repeats or reiterates nearby text - unless it's clickable and the text isn't (which is a bad idea), it shouldn't need alt text.

Where I sometimes struggle is with illustrative photos. I feel they ought to be alt-ed so that anyone who could view images knows there is something there to look at, but how to phrase the text ... should it be "Photo of [whatever]"? A lot of guidelines say that you shouldn't include words like that, but do screen readers make it clear when they are reading alt text rather than normal text?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree that a lot of authors give far too many images &#034;alt text&#034;.</p>
<p>The test I always use is &#034;What would I want to be there if the image can&#039;t be shown?&#034; - it sounds so simple, but it does help me to think about whether an image really needs alt-ing.</p>
<p>That&#039;s particularly true when the image simply repeats or reiterates nearby text - unless it&#039;s clickable and the text isn&#039;t (which is a bad idea), it shouldn&#039;t need alt text.</p>
<p>Where I sometimes struggle is with illustrative photos. I feel they ought to be alt-ed so that anyone who could view images knows there is something there to look at, but how to phrase the text &#8230; should it be &#034;Photo of [whatever]&#034;? A lot of guidelines say that you shouldn&#039;t include words like that, but do screen readers make it clear when they are reading alt text rather than normal text?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas</title>
		<link>http://accessibility.net.nz/blog/alt-attributes-can-be-tricky/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 19:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accessibility.net.nz/?p=61#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Hullo Taz, Yes, alt attribute's required, but it doesn't mean it shouldn't sometimes be empty ;)

Glad you enjoyed the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hullo Taz, Yes, alt attribute&#039;s required, but it doesn&#039;t mean it shouldn&#039;t sometimes be empty ;)</p>
<p>Glad you enjoyed the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarique Naseem</title>
		<link>http://accessibility.net.nz/blog/alt-attributes-can-be-tricky/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarique Naseem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 18:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accessibility.net.nz/?p=61#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I am of course guilty of this myself; But then it was always drummed into me that an Alt text was always required.

But what you say makes complete sense, and I shall certainly treat Alt with a bit more respect :)

Dean also makes a great suggestion about turning off images occasionally to test the site's usability.

Great article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am of course guilty of this myself; But then it was always drummed into me that an Alt text was always required.</p>
<p>But what you say makes complete sense, and I shall certainly treat Alt with a bit more respect :)</p>
<p>Dean also makes a great suggestion about turning off images occasionally to test the site&#039;s usability.</p>
<p>Great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas</title>
		<link>http://accessibility.net.nz/blog/alt-attributes-can-be-tricky/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 05:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accessibility.net.nz/?p=61#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Hey Dean!  Keyword stuffing in the alt attribute was indeed common practice, but I think search engines have seen the light, and in the end, a site should be designed for human visitors, not bots :)  Glad you've abandonned the technique :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dean!  Keyword stuffing in the alt attribute was indeed common practice, but I think search engines have seen the light, and in the end, a site should be designed for human visitors, not bots :)  Glad you&#039;ve abandonned the technique :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Marshall</title>
		<link>http://accessibility.net.nz/blog/alt-attributes-can-be-tricky/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 23:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accessibility.net.nz/?p=61#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Dean holds his hand in the air and confesses: this is something that I have been guilty of in the past (and to a lesser extent perhaps still to this day). 

It was a commonly promoted SEO technique six or seven years ago - when crawlers such as Google were coming to prominence. I know I read about it and adopted the technique and I realise I never - until now - consciously made the decision to abandon the technique.

This article is a handy reminder to those of us who are out of the habit - turn images off occasionally and see how your site looks and reads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dean holds his hand in the air and confesses: this is something that I have been guilty of in the past (and to a lesser extent perhaps still to this day). </p>
<p>It was a commonly promoted SEO technique six or seven years ago - when crawlers such as Google were coming to prominence. I know I read about it and adopted the technique and I realise I never - until now - consciously made the decision to abandon the technique.</p>
<p>This article is a handy reminder to those of us who are out of the habit - turn images off occasionally and see how your site looks and reads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

